Senate Health Care Bill Includes Deep Cuts to Medicaid
By ROBERT PEAR and THOMAS KAPLAN
JUNE 22, 2017 - New York Times
WASHINGTON
— Senate Republicans, who have promised a repeal of the Affordable Care Act for
seven years, took a major step on Thursday toward that goal, unveiling a bill to
make deep cuts in Medicaid
and end the lawfs mandate that most Americans have health
insurance.
The
142-page
bill would create a new system of federal tax credits to help people buy
health insurance, while offering states the ability to drop many of the benefits
required by the Affordable Care Act, like maternity care, emergency services and
mental
health treatment.
But
the measure landed in rough seas ahead of a vote that Senator Mitch McConnell of
Kentucky, the majority leader, wants next week. Four conservative senators, Rand
Paul of Kentucky, Ted Cruz of Texas, Mike Lee of Utah and Ron Johnson of
Wisconsin, announced that they would oppose it without changes — more than
enough to bring it down.
gIt does not appear this draft as written will accomplish
the most important promise that we made to Americans: to repeal Obamacare and
lower their health care costs,h the four wrote in a joint statement.
More moderate Republican senators,
such as Dean Heller of Nevada, expressed their own qualms, as did the American
Hospital Association, the American Cancer Society Cancer
Action Network and the Association of American Medical Colleges.
gWe are extremely disappointed by the Senate bill released
today,h the
medical
school association
wrote. gDespite promises to the contrary, it will leave millions of people
without health coverage, and others with only bare bones plans that will be
insufficient to properly address their needs.h
Once promised as a top-to-bottom revamp of the health bill
passed
by the House last month, the Senate bill instead maintains its structure,
with modest adjustments. The Senate version is, in some respects, more moderate
than the House bill, offering more financial assistance to some lower-income
people to help them defray the rapidly rising cost of private health
insurance.
But the Senate bill would make
subsidies less generous than under current law. It would lower the income limit
for receiving subsidies to cover insurance premiums to 350 percent of the
poverty level, or about $42,000 for an individual, from 400 percent.
Older people could be disproportionately hurt because they
pay more for insurance in general. Both chambersf bills would allow insurers to
charge older people five times as much as younger ones; the limit now is three
times.
The Senate measure, like the House bill, would phase out
the extra money that the federal government has provided to states as an
incentive to expand eligibility for Medicaid. And like the House measure, it
would put the entire Medicaid program on a budget, ending the open-ended
entitlement that now exists.
It would also repeal most of the tax increases imposed by
the Affordable Care Act — a capital gains tax cut for the affluent would be
retroactive for this year — to pay for expanded coverage, in effect handing a
broad tax cut to the affluent in a measure that would also slice billions of
dollars
from Medicaid, a health care program that serves one in five Americans, not
only the poor but almost two-thirds of people in nursing
homes. The bill, drafted in secret, is likely to come to the Senate floor
next week, and could come to a vote after 20 hours of debate.
If it passes, President Trump and the Republican Congress
would be on the edge of a major overhaul of the American health care system —
about one-sixth
of the nationfs economy.
The premise of the bill, repeated almost daily in some
form or other by its chief author, Mr. McConnell, is that gObamacare is
collapsing around us, and the American people are desperately searching for
relief.h
Mr. Trump shares that view, and the Senate bill, if
adopted, would move the president a great distance closer to being able to boast
about final passage of a marquee piece of legislation, a feat he has so far been
unable to accomplish.
Democrats and some insurers blame the Republicans and Mr.
Trump for sabotaging the law, in part by threatening to withhold subsidies used
to help pay for deductibles and co-payments for millions of poor people covered
by the law.
And President Barack Obama, who
has been hesitant to speak up on political issues since leaving office, waded
forcefully into the health-care debate Thursday, saying the Senate proposal
showed a gfundamental meannessh that would harm anyone who gets old, gets sick
or starts a family.
gThe Senate bill, unveiled today, is not a health care
bill,h Mr. Obama
wrote on his Facebook page. gItfs a massive transfer of wealth from
middle-class and poor families to the richest people in America. It hands
enormous tax cuts to the rich and to the drug and insurance industries, paid for
by cutting health care for everybody else.h
In a message to his supporters, the former president and
Obamacare namesake urged people to demand real compromise from their lawmakers
before senators vote on the Republican bill next week.
gI believe that itfs possible – if you are willing to make
a difference again,h he wrote. gIf youfre willing to call your members of
Congress. If you are willing to visit their offices. If you are willing to speak
out let them and the country know, in very real terms, what this means for you
and your family.h
In the Senate, Democrats are determined to defend a law
that has provided coverage to 20 million people and is a pillar of former
President Barack Obamafs legacy. The debate over the repeal bill is shaping up
as a titanic political clash, which could have major implications for both
parties, affecting their electoral prospects for years to come.
Mr. McConnell faces a great challenge in amassing the
votes to win Senate approval of the bill, which Republicans are trying to pass
using special budget rules that will allow them to avoid a Democratic filibuster.
But with only 52 seats, Mr. McConnell can afford to lose only two Republicans,
with Vice President Mike Pence breaking the tie.
Democrats are unified in opposing the repeal efforts, and
they have already assailed Republicans for putting the bill together without a
single public hearing or bill-drafting session.
In the short term, the possible electoral consequences are
more muted in the Senate than in the House, as only two of the Senate
Republicans who face re-election next year, Mr. Heller and Jeff Flake of
Arizona, are seen as vulnerable.
But Republican leaders still must contend with internal
divisions that will be difficult to overcome. Numerous Republican senators from
states that expanded Medicaid are concerned about how a rollback of the program
could affect their constituents, and they face pressure from governors back
home.
Some senators have concerns based
on other issues specific to their states, including the opioid
epidemic that has battered states like West Virginia and Ohio. And some of
the Senatefs most conservative members could resist a bill that they view as not
going far enough in dismantling the Affordable Care Act.
Senators will not have long to sort out their differences.
Mr. McConnell wants to hold a vote before lawmakers return home for the Fourth
of July recess. If the repeal bill is still looming over the Senate, Republicans
are certain to face intense pressure from constituents who wish to see the
Affordable Care Act remain in place.
The assessment being made by senators will be shaped in
part by an analysis of the bill to be released by the Congressional Budget
Office, the official scorekeeper on Capitol Hill.
The budget office found that the bill passed by the House
last month would leave 23
million more people without insurance in a decade. Mr. Trump recently told
senators that the
House bill was gmean,h though weeks earlier he had celebrated its
passage.
Under the Senate bill, the federal government would
continue paying crucial subsidies to health insurance companies through 2019.
Mr. Trump has threatened to halt payment of the subsidies, which reimburse
insurers so they can reduce out-of-pocket costs for low-income people. Without
this money, many insurers have said, they will sharply increase premiums or pull
out of the marketplaces in many states.
The Senate bill would roll back the expansion of Medicaid
under the Affordable Care Act, gradually reducing the extra money that states
receive for newly eligible beneficiaries. The bill would also cap overall
federal spending on Medicaid: States would receive a per-beneficiary allotment
of money, but federal payments would grow more slowly than under the House bill,
starting in 2025. Alternately, states could receive an annual lump sum of
federal money in the form of a block grant.
State officials and health policy experts predict that
many people would be dropped from Medicaid because states would not fill the
fiscal hole left by the loss of federal money.
gThe Senate bill creates an illusion of being less
draconian than the House bill, but is arguably more soh on Medicaid, said Sara
Rosenbaum, a professor of health law and policy at George Washington
University.
The Senate bill, like the House
measure, would repeal taxes imposed on high-income people by the Affordable Care
Act: an increase in their payroll taxes and a surtax on their net investment
income.
The bill would delay a tax on high-cost employer-sponsored
health insurance — the so-called Cadillac tax — to 2026. Under current law, it
is scheduled to take effect in 2020. Employers and labor unions detest the tax
and would have nearly a decade to try to kill it.
The Senate bill would provide $50 billion to help
stabilize insurance markets and hold down premiums from 2018 through 2021. The
money would be distributed by the federal government to insurance companies that
apply. In addition, the bill would provide $62 billion in grants to states for
similar purposes from 2019 to 2026.
The bill would generally prohibit consumers from using
federal tax credits to help buy insurance that includes coverage for abortions.
Democrats plan to challenge this provision as a violation of Senate rules being
used to speed passage of the repeal bill.